BPTI. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BERS 14/7 Ry
jist Ser gar, HS BUARL FOR CURREU ION Ur NAVAL ReEGOURUS
ie 704 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2496
DIC
Docket No. NR7?727-13
19 Nov 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
18 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and proceaures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser
N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error ox injustice- “In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel. will be
furnished upon request.
Tt ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case.’ In this regard, st is important to keep jn mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR7727-13
consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Dal dl,/
=
me
ae
. * Fuecutive Director
Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/14U1330 dtd 10 Oct 14
#
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7727 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9045 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8921 13
NR8921-13 te tates oe Te ee to your application for correction of your naval This is in referen 0 uSC 1552. . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0406 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser 1130C/14U0650 dated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to gGemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4201 14
“pocumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, requiations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/14U1201 dated 11 September 2014, a COpy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 duly 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1400651 Gated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4814 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ‘on 10 March 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/1300997 dated eres a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4752 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/13U1038 dated ea, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...